A delay of 43 years in a historical sexual offence prosecution does not of itself warrant a permanent stay. The loss of witnesses and records constitutes lost opportunity rather than actual lost evidence where the content of the lost material is speculative, and such prejudice is amenable to amelioration by forensic disadvantage directions. The distinction between actual lost evidence and speculative lost opportunity remains critical to permanent stay applications.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 3 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.