Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v Ud (No 4) [2020] ACTSC 226 — Criminal & Jurisdiction, Practice — Barrister AI

R v Ud (No 4)

[2020] ACTSC 226

Supreme Court of the ACT18 August 2020

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal
1. Law
2. › JURISDICTION, PRACTICE
1. evidence obtained covertly
1. Whether covert procedure tainted DNA evidence

Case Details

Citation[2020] ACTSC 226

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date18 August 2020

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

Cited by1

2024DPP v Okwechime (No 2)ACTSC 34

Relies on9

2020Director of Public Prosecutions v YerburyNSWSC 905
2010Cornwell v RNSWCCA 59
2009Fleming v RNSWCCA 233
2009Parker v Comptroller-General of CustomsHCA 7
and 5 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works