Where tendency evidence is relied upon at trial and a conviction on one count is set aside as unreasonable, the conviction on another count must also be set aside if there is a realistic possibility the jury relied on the unreasonable finding to support tendency reasoning for the remaining count. In assessing unreasonableness of historic sexual assault convictions, the absence of prior complaints corresponding to the specific charge, combined with a long delay in disclosure and uncontradicted evidence from family members undermining the probability of the complainant's account, may render a conviction unreasonable even where the complainant is accepted as honest. The Court noted but did not resolve a potential tension between the R v TK approach to reconciling verdicts and the Pell assumption that the complainant was assessed as credible and reliable.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 6 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 6 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.