Rule 668(1)(b) UCPR is confined to newly discovered facts and cannot be used to reopen a concluded appeal on the basis of legal arguments not previously raised. The Court of Appeal retains inherent jurisdiction to restrain further applications in a concluded proceeding where no basis for re-enlivening jurisdiction has been identified, even where the requirements of r 389A UCPR may not be clearly met.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.