Rule 667(2)(d) UCPR only permits the setting aside of an order that does not reflect the court's intention at the time it was made; it cannot be used to reargue a finally determined matter on the basis of extraneous developments such as submissions to a Parliamentary Committee. Where a litigant has been required to obtain leave before filing further applications, the court may order that future leave applications be made without notice to the respondent to protect the respondent from the burden of responding to unmeritorious applications.
The full text is available to signed-in members.