Young v Crime and Corruption Commission

[2020] QCA 237

Queensland Court of Appeal

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Practice and Procedure
2. › Judgments and orders
3. › Reopening or varying final orders
4. › Discovery of new facts after order made
5. › Whether facts discovered after order that would have entitled different order
6. › Whether post-order events constitute newly discovered facts
7. › Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld), r 668(1)(b)
1. Practice and Procedure
2. › Vexatious litigants and case management
3. › Leave required to file further applications
4. › Discretionary considerations
5. › Whether leave should be granted to file further application in finalised appeal
1. Practice and Procedure
2. › Judgments and orders
3. › Enforcement of judgments
4. › Whether findings in reasons for judgment are enforceable orders

Quick Take

UCPR r 668(1)(b) applies only to facts that existed before but were discovered after the making of the order; it does not extend to events occurring after the order or to legal arguments not previously raised. Findings in reasons for judgment are not enforceable orders.

Case Details

Citation[2020] QCA 237

CourtQCA

JurisdictionQueensland

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

Cited by1

2021Young v Crime and Corruption CommissionQCA 256

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in