Under s 42(5)(a) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth), the requirement that there be 'no grounds on which to make the order' relates back to and invokes the statutory tests in ss 18 and 19 for the making of restraining orders; the applicant for revocation is not required to prove a negative proposition that no circumstances exist warranting a restraining order. Under ss 18(1)(f) and 19(1)(f), the court's task is confined to assessing the reasonableness of the grounds stated by the authorised officer for holding the relevant suspicion; the court may not substitute grounds identified by lawyers or the court itself. For offences under s 184(2) of the Corporations Act and s 135.1 of the Criminal Code, it is not necessary that an actual advantage, gain or loss be suspected — suspicion of the requisite dishonest intention suffices.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 5 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.