When a conviction appeal results in a finding that certain particulars were not capable of being established beyond reasonable doubt, the appellate court must resentence on the facts found by the trial judge for the surviving particulars. The appellate court's task on resentencing is to determine the appropriate sentence independently, not to reconstruct what the trial judge would have imposed but for the error. Sentencing patterns for s 101 of the Children and Community Services Act 2004 (WA) remain undeveloped.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.
1 of the 1 citing case carries a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.