The emergence of COVID-19 after sentencing does not provide a basis for appellate interference with a sentence that was appropriate when imposed. An appellate court cannot intervene on the basis of post-sentencing events unrelated to facts in existence at the time of sentencing, and the extraordinary nature of the pandemic does not create an exception to this principle. There is no concept of a retrospective infringement of the totality principle.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 9 later cases that cite this judgment.
6 of the 9 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.