A sentencing judge's erroneous inclusion of a non-existent prior conviction in an offender's criminal record constitutes a specific error of the [name withheld] v The King kind, requiring the appellate court to exercise the sentencing discretion afresh. The corrected criminal record may warrant not only a reduced head sentence but also greater concurrency and a reduced non-parole period ratio reflecting improved rehabilitation prospects.
The full text is available to signed-in members.