Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Barilaro v Shanks-Markovina (No 2) [2021] FCA 950 — Parliamentary & Evidence — Barrister AI

Barilaro v Shanks-Markovina (No 2)

[2021] FCA 950

Federal Court of Australia

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Constitutional Law
2. › Parliamentary
1. privilege
2. › evidence
3. › where Art 9 Bill of Rights 1688 (Eng)
1. prohibits impeaching or questioning in court anything done in proceeding in
1. Parliament
2. › whether Art 9 prevents publisher

Case Details

Citation[2021] FCA 950

CourtFCA

JurisdictionCommonwealth

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by4

2022Herron v HarperCollins Publishers Australia Pty Ltd (No 2)FCAFC 119
2022Edwards v Nine Network Australia Pty LimitedFCA 509
2021Barilaro v Shanks-Markovina (No 3)FCA 1100
2021BDR21 v Australian Broadcasting CorporationFCA 960

Relies on42

2021Barilaro v Shanks-Markovina (No 1)FCA 789
2019Domican v Pan Macmillan Australia Pty LimitedFCA 1384
2019Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Chau Chak WingFCAFC 125
2018Tony Strickland (a pseudonym) v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions; Donald Galloway (a pseudonym) v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions; Edmund Hodges (a pseudonym) v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions; Rick TuHCA 53
and 38 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works