The case illustrates that where a vexatious proceedings order is subsequently set aside on appeal, proceedings dismissed by operation of that order may be arguable on appeal, and that an amended process seeking substantially the same relief as the original process may be characterised as a continuation of existing proceedings rather than new proceedings.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 4 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.