Indicative sentences specified under s 53A(2) of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 may be compared with the aggregate sentence to demonstrate House v R error in the application of the totality principle, but any attempt to reconstruct precise starting and end points for indicative sentences to show error is misconceived. The authorities in Kliendienst, Lee, Vaughan and Aryal are reconciled on this basis. The ultimate focus remains whether the aggregate sentence reflects the totality of criminality involved.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 21 later cases that cite this judgment.
10 of the 21 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.