Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v Holmes (No 5)

[2021] NSWSC 115

Supreme Court of NSW

View on CaseLaw

More

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Evidence
2. › Voir dire
3. › Tendency evidence
4. › Tendency notice
5. › Defence failure to serve tendency notice within relevant time
6. › Whether Court should dispense with the notice requirement under s 100(1) of the Evidence Act
1. Evidence
2. › Tendency evidence
3. › Significant probative value
4. › Murder
5. › Evidence of a tendency of the deceased to resort to irrational violence following the consumption of alcohol
6. › Defence application to rely on tendency evidence allowed

Case Details

Citation[2021] NSWSC 115

CourtNSWSC

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 8 later cases that cite this judgment.

1 of the 8 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Cited by8

2023R v Carberry (No 3)NSWSC 166
2022The Queen v Drover (No. 2)NTSC 13
and 6 more after sign-in

Relies on4

2020R v HolmesNSWSC 103
2017Hughes v The QueenHCA 20
2006Elias v RNSWCCA 365
2004R v Cakovski, DanielNSWCCA 280

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works

R v Holmes (No 5) [2021] NSWSC 115 — Voir Dire & Tendency Evidence — Barrister AI