R v Carberry (No 3) [2023] NSWSC 166 — Evidence & Significant Probative Value — Barrister AI
← Back
R v Carberry (No 3)
[2023] NSWSC 166
Supreme Court of NSW
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
View on CaseLaw
More
View on CaseLaw
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+3 more
Criminal Law
›
evidence
›
tendency
›
whether evidence has
significant probative value
›
where accused charged
with murder
deceased
›
tendency asserted
Case Details
Citation
[2023] NSWSC 166
Court
NSWSC
Jurisdiction
New South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2023] NSWSC 166
12 authorities it relies on
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2023
Relies on
12
2022
TL v The King
HCA 35
2021
R v Holmes (No 5)
NSWSC 115
2020
DPP v Dixon & Ors (Ruling No 1)
VSC 743
2020
Kadir v The Queen; Grech v The Queen
HCA 1
and 8 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
