Refalo v Gatt (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 1677 — Construction & Costs — Barrister AI
← Back
Refalo v Gatt (No 2)
[2021] NSWSC 1677
Supreme Court of NSW
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
View on CaseLaw
More
View on CaseLaw
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Succession
›
Construction
›
Where wills silent as to date of valuation of property in estate subject to testamentary option exercisable by beneficiaries
›
Where executors had not implemented the process for determination of value required by the wills
›
Where the parties had nonetheless implemented part of the valuation process
›
Where the Court has suggested a pragmatic approach to the determination of the valuation date resulting from the parties’ conduct
›
Where no point of principle
Costs
›
Where plaintiffs and defendants are both beneficiaries and executors under wills
›
Where the proceedings were required to determine the proper construction of the wills in circumstances where that issue was uncertain
›
Where the Court has ordered that the costs incurred by the parties are proper testamentary expenses
›
Where the Court has ordered that the costs of all parties be paid out of the estates of the testators on the indemnity basis
Costs
›
Where plaintiffs propose to discontinue part of proceedings
›
Consideration of the principles
Case Details
Citation
[2021] NSWSC 1677
Court
NSWSC
Jurisdiction
New South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2021] NSWSC 1677
9 authorities it relies on
1942
1958
1974
1990
2006
2021
Relies on
9
2015
Warton v Yeo
NSWCA 115
2003
Shorten v Shorten (No 2)
NSWCA 60
2002
Murdocca v Murdocca (No2)
NSWSC 505
1999
Perpetual Trustee v Baker
NSWCA 244
and 5 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works