› Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act 2011 (NT) s 97 and s 101 - Tendency evidence
› Whether tendency evidence has significant probative value
› whether probative value of the evidence substantially outweighs any potential prejudicial effect on the accused - Evidence admissible
Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act 2011 (NT) s 97, s 97(1), s 101
[name withheld] v The Queen; [name withheld] v The Queen; OAE v The Queen [2008] HCA 16; (2008) 235 CLR 334; Hughes v The Queen [2017] HCA 20; IMM v The Queen (2016) 257 CLR 300; McPhillamy v The Queen [2018] HCA 52; (2018) 361 ALR 13; R v Bauer [2018] HCA 40; (2018) 266 CLR 56; R v Lisoff [1999] NSWCCA 364; The Queen v AW [2018] NTSC 29, applied
Case Details
Citation[2021] NTSC 2
CourtNTSC
JurisdictionNorthern Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.
