› Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act 2011 (NT) s 97 and s 101
› tendency evidence
› whether tendency evidence has significant probative value
› whether probative value of the evidence outweighs any potential prejudicial effect on the accused
› evidence admissible
[name withheld] v The Queen, NS v The Queen [2012] NSWCCA 9; (2012) 215 A Crim R 349; Gilbert v The Queen (2000) 201 CLR 414; L v Tasmania [2006] TASSC 59; (2006) 15 Tas R 381; MLW v The Queen [2018] NTCCA 19; The Queen v Ford [2009] NSWCCA 306; (2009) 201 A Crim R 451; The Queen v Lock (1997) 91 A Crim R 356; The Queen v Lockyer (1996) 89 A Crim R 457; The Queen v O’Brien [2017] NTSC 34, The Queen v Zhang [2005] NSWCCA 437; (2005) 158 A Crim R 504, referred to.
