An offender who performs a variety of facilitative tasks for a drug trafficking syndicate (supply, debt collection, driving, threatening violence) is not to be equated with a street-level dealer for sentencing purposes. Arguments that a sentencing judge gave inadequate weight to rehabilitation or disabilities are matters of weight, not House v The King errors. A case in which leave to appeal was refused provides no guidance as to whether the sentence was at the upper end of the appropriate range.
The full text is available to signed-in members.