Day & Anor v Woolworths Group Limited & Ors

• 1. Equity
  2. › Equitable remedies
  3. › Injunctions
  4. › Interlocutory injunctions
  5. › Restraint of communications with opposing party's insurer
  6. › Whether communications constituted attempted interference with administration of justice
  7. › Whether balance of convenience favoured restraint
• 1. Practice and Procedure
  2. › Abuse of process
  3. › Permanent stay of proceedings
  4. › Failure to comply with statutory obligation to submit to medical examination
  5. › Whether continuation of proceedings while refusing to take necessary steps constituted abuse of process
  6. › Personal Injuries Proceedings Act 2002 (Qld), s 25(2)
• 1. Courts and Judges
  2. › Disqualification for interest or bias
  3. › Apprehended bias
  4. › Professional associations between judges and barristers
  5. › Whether friendships between judges and barristers raise apprehension of bias
  6. › Whether non-disclosure of professional associations evidences apprehension of bias
  7. › Whether prior adverse findings against litigant raise apprehension of bias in subsequent proceedings
• 1. Courts and Judges
  2. › Judges
  3. › Powers and duties in respect of unrepresented litigants
  4. › Whether self-represented litigant received procedural fairness
  5. › Whether presiding judge obliged to advise self-represented litigant how to conduct case

Quick Take