› FAILING TO COMPLY WITH AN ANIMAL WELFARE DIRECTION
› FAILING TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE TREATMENT FOR AN ANIMAL
› whether recorded conversation should have been admitted into evidence
› whether there was a failure to comply with the direction
› whether direction was a valid one
Animals- Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Sentence
› whether fine of $5,000 was manifestly excessive- whether costs could be referred to SPER- whether length of prohibition order was excessive
EVIDENCE- PROOF- Whether onus on the prosecution to exclude whether the appellant had a reasonable excuse or whether it was for the appellant to prove he did have a reasonable excuse
Case Details
Citation[2021] QDC 94
CourtQDC
JurisdictionQueensland
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.
