A litigant's complaint to the head of jurisdiction about other members of a panel does not, without more, give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias on the part of the head of jurisdiction. A judge's participation in a prior unrelated appeal involving the same litigant does not establish actual bias merely because the litigant disagrees with the outcome of the prior appeal.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 6 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 6 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.