The Court dismissed a recusal application, holding that a judge's prior employment at the same large law firm as a party's general counsel, and prior employment at the Crown Solicitor's Office, did not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias where the associations were remote in time, involved different practice groups, and had no rational connection to the issues in the proceeding.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.