Where a lawyer's failure to arrange timely entry of a guilty plea results in a lower statutory discount under Division 1A of the CSPA, this constitutes a material irregularity amounting to a miscarriage of justice, but the prescriptive nature of the provisions means the Court of Criminal Appeal cannot simply increase the discount — it must exercise the sentencing discretion afresh. Section 25C(2) cannot be construed to include situations where notice 'ought to have been' served. The case fell outside the category of discrete mathematical errors correctable without full [name withheld] resentencing because the sentencing judge was unaware of the applicant's earlier instructions and may have approached the sentencing exercise differently.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 15 later cases that cite this judgment.
9 of the 15 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.