JDT v PDL (No 2)

[2022] QDC 147

District Court of Queensland

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Procedure
2. › Anonymisation
3. › Applicant sought to have name anonymised in published reasons
4. › where it is a fundamental function of the Court to be conducted in an open and public way
5. › Where the Court has an implied power to regulate its processes
6. › Whether it is in the interests of justice that interlocutory judgments be published on the Court’s website in a redacted form.
1. Procedure
2. › Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld)
3. › where paragraphs of the defendant’s defence are non-compliant with UCPR 166(4)
4. › Where there are therefore deemed admissions as to the plaintiff’s pleading pursuant to UCPR 166(5)
5. › Whether the defendant ought to be granted leave to withdraw the deemed admissions and re-plead her defence.
1. Procedure
2. › Referral to mediation
3. › Where it is premature to refer the matter to mediation in light of further directions relating to pleadings which are yet to be satisfied.
1. Procedure
2. › Costs
3. › Where defendant sought 75% of the costs of the application be payable by the plaintiff
4. › where the plaintiff sought costs of the application be costs in proceeding
5. › Where, in the case of mixed success, the pragmatic view is that the plaintiff is to pay 50% of the defendant’s costs of the application.