An admitted lie or deliberate fabrication by a complainant about one allegation does not necessarily render jury verdicts on other charges unreasonable; the jury may rationally put aside the false account as a discrepancy that fails to disturb the convincingness of the remainder of the evidence. The 'must have doubted' rather than 'might have doubted' distinction from Pell remains the governing test for unreasonable verdict appeals in Victoria.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.
1 of the 1 citing case carries a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.