The sworn account of a person who claims to have experienced a sexual assault is capable, without more, of proving the assault beyond reasonable doubt. The requirement for corroboration has been abolished in every Australian jurisdiction. Where there is evidence (even if tenuous) capable of supporting a finding that consent was negated by intoxication, the alternative case must be left to the jury. There is no specific legal 'level' of intoxication required before a lack of consent can be inferred.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.
3 of the 5 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.