Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Hoy v Hurst-Meyers (No 4) [2023] ACTSC 17 — Jurisdiction, Practice And Procedure — Barrister AI

Hoy v Hurst-Meyers (No 4)

[2023] ACTSC 17

Supreme Court of the ACT3 February 2023

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Civil Hearing
2. › JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
1. conditions to attach to stay
2. › consideration of state of evidence before
1. sale of Queanbeyan property
2. › balance of convenience
1. least onerous

Case Details

Citation[2023] ACTSC 17

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date3 February 2023

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by2

2024Hoy, in the matter of Hurst-Meyers v Hurst-MeyersFedCFamC2G 187
2023Hoy v RHM Industries Pty LtdFCA 115

Relies on2

2023Hoy v Hurst-Meyers (No 3)ACTSC 6
2002McLean Tecnic v Digi-Tech; Kalifair v Digi-TechNSWCA 383

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works