Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Hoy v Hurst-Meyers (No 3) [2023] ACTSC 6 — Jurisdiction, Practice And Procedure — Barrister AI

Hoy v Hurst-Meyers (No 3)

[2023] ACTSC 6

Supreme Court of the ACT20 January 2023

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Civil Hearing
2. › JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
1. urgent application in proceeding
2. › application to stay orders made by
1. primary
1. judge
2. › stay application brought in circumstances where a

Case Details

Citation[2023] ACTSC 6

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date20 January 2023

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by4

2025Jeffcott v Davesi Construction Group Pty Ltd (No 3)ACTSC 1
2024Hoy, in the matter of Hurst-Meyers v Hurst-MeyersFedCFamC2G 187
2023Hoy v RHM Industries Pty LtdFCA 115
2023Hoy v Hurst-Meyers (No 4)ACTSC 17

Relies on8

2022Gindy v Capital Lawyers Pty LtdACTCA 66
2022Hurst-Meyers v Hoy (No 3)ACTCA 50
2022Hurst-Meyers v Hoy (No 2)ACTCA 38
2022Hurst-Meyers v HoyACTCA 36
and 4 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works