CJZ Pty Ltd v Giant Dwarf Pty Ltd; CJZ Pty Ltd v Morrow

• 1. Misleading and Deceptive Conduct
  2. › Silence and non-disclosure
  3. › Joint venture relationship
  4. › Whether failure to disclose negotiations constituted misleading or deceptive conduct
  5. › Whether reasonable expectation of disclosure
  6. › Whether rescission appropriate remedy
  7. › Australian Consumer Law (Sch 2, Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)), s 237
• 1. Contract
  2. › Implied terms
  3. › Joint venture agreement
  4. › Whether implied term requiring disclosure of business opportunities
  5. › Whether necessary to decide implied term where misleading conduct otherwise established
  6. › BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings (1977) 180 CLR 266
  7. › Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of NSW (1982) 149 CLR 337
• 1. Defamation
  2. › Defences
  3. › Qualified privilege
  4. › Common law qualified privilege
  5. › Whether communication published on privileged occasion
  6. › Whether communication relevant to occasion
  7. › Whether express malice established
  8. › Whether dominant purpose was improper purpose foreign to privileged occasion
  9. › Defamation Act 2005 (NSW)
• 1. Costs
  2. › Calderbank offers
  3. › Indemnity costs
  4. › Whether primary judge erred in declining to award indemnity costs
  5. › Whether offeree would have been in better position had offer been accepted
  6. › Whether unreasonable to reject offer
  7. › Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98

Quick Take