A civil negligence claim against a legal aid provider alleging inadequate trial funding caused an unfair criminal trial and wrongful conviction constitutes an impermissible collateral attack on the undisturbed conviction and is an abuse of process, regardless of the claimant's subjective intention not to overturn the conviction. The question of whether VLA owes a duty of care to funding applicants was expressly left open.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 3 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.