The totality principle's second limb (crushing sentence) is not absolute and cannot be invoked where to do so would inadequately reflect the nature, quality and extent of the offender's overall criminal behaviour, even where the offender is of advanced age and may die in prison. The court cautioned that prosecutors should carefully consider whether the probative benefit of multiplying categories of cross-admissible propensity evidence justifies the impact on trial complexity.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 12 later cases that cite this judgment.
6 of the 12 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.