› objection to admission of police body‑worn camera footage
› submission that non‑compliance with s 81A of Evidence (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1991 (ACT) should lead to exclusion under s 81B
› s 81B does not provide for exclusion when recording not used as evidence in chief and otherwise admissible
Statutes
› INTERPRETATION
› Examples in Act
› where s 132 of Legislation Act 2001 (ACT) permits examples to extend meaning of Act
› Example 1 in s 43B(4)(a) of Crimes (Surveillance Devices) Act 2010 (ACT) means that use of body‑worn camera will be overt if camera worn in a way that is visible to person being recorded
› body‑worn camera footage admissible
Case Details
Citation[2024] ACTSC 186
CourtACTSC
JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory
Decision Date12 June 2024
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.
