DPP v Ivanisevic (No 3)

[2024] ACTSC 24

Supreme Court of the ACT

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Criminal Law
1. Evidence
1. police did not announce to the complainant that the complainant was being recorded
1. proceeded on assumption that the body-worn camera footage was prima facie inadmissible

Citation[2024] ACTSC 24

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

Already have an account? Sign in