Where a sentencing judge expressly finds that the difference in culpability between co-offenders warrants only a 'slightly longer' sentence, the imposition of a head sentence 33% longer (or equal to the co-offender's undiscounted sentence after discount) constitutes an unreasonable disparity indicating miscarriage of the sentencing discretion.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 8 later cases that cite this judgment.
8 of the 8 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.