Inconsistencies and deficiencies in complainant evidence in sexual assault cases, including inconsistencies between complainants' accounts, contemporaneous documents suggesting positive relationships with the accused, and the complainant's demeanour in photographs, do not necessarily give rise to a reasonable doubt where plausible explanations exist and the jury had the advantage of seeing and hearing the witnesses.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.