Edquist-Wheeler v R

• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Sentencing
  3. › Appeal against sentence
  4. › Commencement date of sentence
  5. › Procedural fairness
  6. › Whether sentencing judge denied procedural fairness by departing from indicated course without affording opportunity to make submissions
  7. › Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 47
• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Sentencing
  3. › Accumulation of sentences
  4. › Totality principle
  5. › Revocation of Intensive Correction Order
  6. › Whether sentencing judge erred in failing to apply totality principles when accumulating sentence on revoked ICO
  7. › Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (NSW), s 165
• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Sentencing
  3. › Protective custody
  4. › Whether sentencing judge erred by making factual error about applicant's protective custody and failing to take it into account
• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Sentencing
  3. › Non-parole period
  4. › Special circumstances
  5. › Effect of accumulation of sentences on total non-parole period
  6. › Whether sentencing judge erred by not finding special circumstances
  7. › Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 44

Quick Take