R v Mej

• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Appeal and new trial
  3. › Misdirection or non-direction
  4. › Written directions to jury
  5. › Elements of offence
  6. › Whether direction that element 'not in dispute' when element was in fact disputed occasioned miscarriage of justice
• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Appeal and new trial
  3. › Misdirection or non-direction
  4. › Propensity reasoning
  5. › Multiple counts of violence against same complainant
  6. › Uncharged acts led as relationship evidence
  7. › Whether directions adequate to guard against impermissible propensity reasoning
  8. › Evidence Act 1977 (Qld)
• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Appeal and new trial
  3. › Verdict unreasonable or insupportable having regard to evidence
  4. › Single witness case
  5. › Domestic violence
  6. › Whether verdicts unreasonable where complainant sole witness with inconsistencies in evidence
• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Appeal and new trial
  3. › Inconsistent verdicts
  4. › Acquittals on some counts and convictions on others
  5. › Whether logical and rational basis for different verdicts
  6. › Whether acquittals demonstrate jury did not accept evidence necessary for guilty verdicts

Quick Take