Sandbach v Victorian Legal Services Commissioner

[2024] VSCA 143

Victorian Court of Appeal

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Legal Practitioners
2. › Disciplinary proceedings
3. › Professional misconduct
4. › Breach of conduct rules
5. › Barrister making allegations of fraud against another legal practitioner
6. › Whether available material provided proper basis for allegation
7. › Whether client instructed allegation to be made
8. › Legal Profession Uniform Conduct (Barristers) Rules 2015, r 65
9. › Legal Profession Uniform Law, ss 297(1)(a), 298(b)
1. Legal Practitioners
2. › Disciplinary proceedings
3. › Penalty
4. › Reprimand and prohibition from applying for practising certificate
5. › Whether VCAT erred in imposing penalty
6. › Relevance of prior professional history
7. › Whether House v The King error established
8. › Legal Profession Uniform Law, ss 299(1)(b), 303(1)(j)
1. Appeal
2. › Appeal from VCAT
3. › Requirement of question of law
4. › Whether findings of fact raise question of law
5. › Whether inadequate reasons constitute error of law
6. › Whether refusal to allow cross-examination questions constitutes error of law
7. › Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998, s 148(1)(a)

Quick Take

Barristers making allegations of fraud or serious misconduct must ensure that the material available at the time the allegation is made provides a proper basis for it under r 65(a), and must have client instructions after advising of consequences under r 65(b). Tax-related conduct may be taken into account in penalty proceedings.