Prosecutors seeking to rely on coincidence evidence across different types of sexual offending (online vs contact offences) must demonstrate that the similarities are more than generic features commonly found in that type of offending, and cannot aggregate diffuse similarities to reach the threshold of significant probative value without exposing the reasoning process.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.
1 of the 1 citing case carries a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.