Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

DPP v Sheridan (a pseudonym) (No 2) [2025] ACTSC 56 — Criminal Law — Barrister AI

DPP v Sheridan (a pseudonym) (No 2)

[2025] ACTSC 56

Supreme Court of the ACT

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
1. application for advance ruling regarding admissibility of evidence of complainant’s mental health and medication
1. relevance of side effects of medication and combination of medication with alcohol
1. whether complainant’s mental health conditions made her more likely to be impulsive

Case Details

Citation[2025] ACTSC 56

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by2

2025DPP v Sheridan (a pseudonym) (No 5)ACTSC 75
2025DPP v Sheridan (a pseudonym) (No 4)ACTSC 61

Relies on1

1998Farrell v RHCA 50

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works