← Back
DPP v Sheridan (a pseudonym) (No 4)
[2025] ACTSC 61
Supreme Court of the ACT
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+2 more
Criminal Law
application for disclosure of protected confidences
accused seeking complainant’s health records to confirm if complainant received diagnoses of mental illnesses by a medical practitioner
documents produced on subpoena by Canberra Health Services did not fall within this description
Case Details
Citation
[2025] ACTSC 61
Court
ACTSC
Jurisdiction
Australian Capital Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2025] ACTSC 61
3 authorities it relies on
2023
2024
2025
Relies on
3
2025
BJT v Australian Capital Territory
ACTSC 69
2025
DPP v Sheridan (a pseudonym) (No 2)
ACTSC 56
2023
Stanley (a pseudonym) v Commonwealth of Australia
ACTSC 157
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
DPP v Sheridan (a pseudonym) (No 4) [2025] ACTSC 61 — Criminal Law — Barrister AI
