Where a sentencing judge has anticipated and accounted for the adverse effects of particular conditions of imprisonment on an offender's mental health, subsequent evidence that those anticipated effects have materialised does not constitute fresh evidence capable of reopening the sentencing discretion on appeal.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 3 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.