Practitioners representing corporate defendants in SA criminal proceedings must ensure that only a director (not a mere employee or officer) seeks leave to appear under JCR r 26.1(4)(b). The case also confirms that defendants challenging photographic speed detection evidence must adduce positive proof to the contrary rather than merely attacking the sufficiency of prosecution certificates or seeking broad disclosure in the hope of finding material to support unparticularised challenges.
The full text is available to signed-in members.