Kim v Kim (Ruling) [2026] VCC 7 — Plaintiff Apparently & No Appearance At — Barrister AI
← Back
Kim v Kim (Ruling)
[2026] VCC 7
County Court of Victoria
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+2 more
Plaintiff’s failure to comply with orders of the Court
failure to take steps to advance litigation
plaintiff apparently
receives messages via KakaoTalk but does not respond
›
no appearance at
Case Details
Citation
[2026] VCC 7
Court
VCC
Jurisdiction
Victoria
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2026] VCC 7
2 authorities it relies on
2015
2017
2019
2021
2023
2026
Relies on
2
2022
Efektiv Pty Ltd v Madgwicks
VSCA 72
2015
Sullivan v Greyfriars Pty Ltd
VSCA 196
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
