Use of electronic devices in courtrooms
6908 Use of electronic devices in courtrooms
A person must not use an electronic device in a court room unless—
the person is—
a party to a proceeding before the court; or
a legal representative of a party to a proceeding before the court; or
a media representative; or
the person is permitted by the presiding judicial officer to use the device.
Unless permitted by the presiding judicial officer, a person mentioned in subrule (1) must not use an electronic device in a court room if use of the device—
interferes with the court recording system or other technology; or
in the opinion of the presiding judicial officer, interferes with courtroom behaviour, is inconsistent with the court’s functions, or otherwise impedes the administration of justice; or
generates sound or requires speaking into the device; or
records a photograph or video image; or
records or digitally transcribes the proceedings other than in accordance with this rule.
If a sheriff’s officer or another officer of the court reasonably believes that a person is using an electronic device in contravention of this rule, the officer may direct the person to—
leave the courtroom; or
give the electronic device to the officer until the person leaves the courtroom; or
allow the officer and the presiding judicial officer access to the electronic device to view any images or listen to any recordings; or
modify or delete the images or recordings on the electronic device as directed by the presiding judicial officer.
A person who contravenes this rule may be dealt with for contempt of court.
The statute text is free to read above. View subscription options to unlock the case-law research tools for each provision.