Surveillance device warrant—deciding the application
13 Surveillance device warrant—deciding the application
A judge or magistrate may issue a surveillance device warrant if satisfied that—
there are reasonable grounds for the suspicion or belief founding the application for the warrant; and
for an unsworn application—it would have been impracticable for an affidavit to have been prepared or sworn before the application was made; and
for a remote application—it would have been impracticable for the application to have been made in person.
In deciding whether a surveillance device warrant should be issued, the judge or magistrate must have regard to the following:
the nature and gravity of the alleged offence or corrupt conduct in relation to which the warrant is sought;
the extent to which the privacy of any person is likely to be affected;
the existence of any alternative means of obtaining the evidence or information sought to be obtained and the extent to which those means may assist or prejudice the investigation;
the evidentiary or intelligence value of any information sought to be obtained;
any previous warrant sought or issued under this division or a corresponding law (if known) in connection with the same offence or corrupt conduct.
This Act’s bill:Explanatory statementSecond reading speech
The statute text is free to read above. View subscription options to unlock the case-law research tools for each provision.