Representation—party with impaired decision-making ability
76 Representation—party with impaired decision-making ability
This section applies if—
the court considers that a party to a proceeding for a family violence order has impaired decision-making ability; and
the person is not represented by—
a lawyer; or
another person with a right to represent the person.
Examples—par (b) (ii)
1 a police officer
2 litigation guardian
3 disability guardian
4 for a child, the child’s parent
The court may, on application, or its own initiative—
adjourn the proceeding so the parties can get representation or appoint a litigation guardian; and
give the parties information necessary to allow the parties to get representation or appoint a litigation guardian; and
tell the public advocate that the proceeding has been adjourned so the parties can get representation or appoint a litigation guardian; and
ask that legal representation be arranged by Legal Aid ACT.
Nothing in this section prevents a court or judicial officer from making an interim order or after-hours order against a respondent with impaired decision-making ability if the court is satisfied of the matters mentioned in section 21 (Interim orders—grounds for making) or section 100 (After-hours orders—grounds for making).
A child under 14 years old cannot be a respondent to an application for a family violence order (see s 75).
In this section:
Legal Aid ACT—see the Legal Aid Act 1977, section 94 (Commission to operate as Legal Aid ACT).
This Act’s bill:Explanatory statementSecond reading speech
The statute text is free to read above. View subscription options to unlock the case-law research tools for each provision.