Action if forensic psychiatric treatment order no longer appropriate—no longer necessary to detain person
106 Action if forensic psychiatric treatment order no longer appropriate—no longer necessary to detain person
This section applies if—
a forensic psychiatric treatment order is in force in relation to a person; and
the forensic psychiatric treatment order requires the person to be detained at an approved mental health facility; and
the chief psychiatrist forms the opinion that it is no longer necessary for the person to be detained.
The chief psychiatrist must give written notice to the following (the notified people):
if the person has a carer—the carer;
if the person has a nominated person—the nominated person;
if the person is covered by a bail order that includes a condition that the person accept supervision under the Bail Act 1992, section 25 (4) (e), section 25A or section 26 (2)—the director‑general responsible for the supervision of the person under the Bail Act 1992;
if the person is a detainee, a person on parole or licence, or a person serving a community-based sentence—the corrections director-general;
if the person is a young detainee or a young offender serving a community-based sentence—the CYP director-general;
if the person is a child—each person with parental responsibility for the person under the Children and Young People Act 2008, division 1.3.2 (Parental responsibility).
The notice must—
include the reasons why the chief psychiatrist is satisfied of the matter mentioned in subsection (1) (c); and
ask whether the notified people are aware of any other information that may be relevant to whether the detention under the forensic psychiatric treatment order continues to be appropriate for the person; and
state that, subject to consideration of any information given under paragraph (b), the chief psychiatrist must tell the ACAT and public advocate of the matter mentioned in subsection (1) (c) and this will lead to an ACAT review of the detention under forensic psychiatric treatment order; and
tell the carer that the carer is entitled to do either or both of the following:
make a submission to the ACAT review of the forensic psychiatric treatment order;
apply to the ACAT to attend the hearing; and
tell the other notified people that they are entitled to make a submission to the ACAT review of the forensic psychiatric treatment order.
Note For principles that must be taken into account when exercising a function under this Act, see s 6.
If, having taken into account any information given under subsection (3) (b), the chief psychiatrist is still satisfied of the matter mentioned in subsection (1) (c) the chief psychiatrist must tell the ACAT and the public advocate in writing about—
the chief psychiatrist’s opinion, including the reasons for the opinion; and
the details of any information given under subsection (3) (b).
The ACAT must review the order within 10 days after being notified under this section (see s 126 (3)).
This Act’s bill:Explanatory statementSecond reading speech
The statute text is free to read above. View subscription options to unlock the case-law research tools for each provision.