Unit Titles (Management) Act 2011

The ACAT may make the following orders:

an order requiring a party to do, or refrain from doing, a stated thing;

an order requiring a party to exercise a function under this Act;

an order requiring an owners corporation to do a stated thing that is ancillary to a function of the corporation under this Act;

an order requiring a person to pay to the Territory or someone else an amount of not more than $1 000;

a declaration—

that a general meeting or executive committee meeting is void for irregularity; or

that a resolution of a general meeting or executive committee meeting is void for irregularity; or

that a rule of the owners corporation is invalid—

because the owners corporation does not have the power to make the rule; or

under section 108 (3); or

for irregularity; or

for an application made under section 127 (1) (d)—that the rule is invalid on the ground that the method in the resolution used to work out the proportion of fund contributions to be paid by each unit owner is not fair;

an order repealing or amending a resolution of a general meeting or executive committee based on a merits review of the resolution by the ACAT;

an order giving effect to an unsuccessful motion for a resolution of a general meeting (either as originally proposed or as amended by the ACAT) if the ACAT is satisfied after a merits review of the motion that opposition to the motion was unreasonable;

an order requiring stated accounts of an owners corporation to be audited, whether by a stated person or a person of a stated kind;

an order allowing an applicant to examine records of the owners corporation;

an order requiring an owners corporation to make or repeal a rule and register a copy of the resolution making or repealing the rule;

an order appointing an administrator to exercise all or stated functions of the owners corporation, the executive committee or an office-holder in the committee;

if the dispute relates to a unit owner or occupier keeping an animal, or allowing an animal to be kept, within the unit and the ACAT considers that the animal causes a nuisance to the owner or occupier of another unit, or unreasonably interferes with the use or enjoyment of another unit or of the common property—

an order to remove the animal from the premises within a stated time; or

any other order the ACAT considers will end the nuisance or the unreasonable interference with use or enjoyment.

The ACAT may make any other order it considers reasonably necessary or convenient to resolve a dispute under this part.

A declaration by the ACAT under subsection (1) (e) (iii) or (iv) that a rule is invalid—

has effect as if the rule were repealed by special resolution of the owners corporation on the day the declaration is made; and

must be lodged by the owners corporation with the registrar‑general for the registration of alternative rules under the Land Titles (Unit Titles) Act 1970, section 27A.

In considering whether to make an order in relation to a special privilege in relation to common property, the ACAT must have regard to—

the interests of all unit owners in the use and enjoyment of their unit and the common property; and

the rights and reasonable expectations of a person deriving or anticipating a benefit under a special privilege in relation to the common property.

This section does not limit the orders the ACAT may make in relation to a dispute under this part.